Hi LLA001
Image 7498391 was rejected for distant and underexposed which are easy to fix. There is also a dust spot in the sky above the building on the left which wasn't mentioned.
Regards
Paul.
Hi Fred
Any chance you can send a screenshot of the notification Google is giving you to support[at]airliners.net?
Thank you
Paul
Hi LLA001 A look at the screening log shows your images are mostly seen by more than one screener. You should edit both shots with the screener feedback in mind and upload again. The links you provided are to your photo corner and you may like to link again from a hosting site such as Flickr for the...
Jump to postHi All As noted screeners do give more leniency to vintage images. The image questioned was seen by more than one screener and as the supply of vintage images is finite, it appears a screener used their discretion. Editing software has improved significantly recently though it is up to the photograp...
Jump to postHi
Yes in your photo corner https://www.airliners.net/user/photo-corner
Hello All
If you see any inappropriate advertisements can you please note the time, OS, device you are using and if possible a screenshot so our Admins are able to investigate?
Thank you
Hi Traffic has changed over the past year or so and we are currently experiencing less forum participation and photo uploads. We do understand the feedback from those in the community who share it here like you. Those you talk with from Verticalscope on the site are with the community management tea...
Jump to postKorean Air resumed seasonal 747-8i operations to Sydney on October 30 and five frames have visited so far
HL7630
HL7632
HL7636
HL7638
HL7644
Hoping to see a couple more including HL7633 which appears to have been returned to service.
Hi
It is not how many you have already but the registration even though the livery you uploaded is not so common.
Hi
Thanks for your post, a reupload has been asked for and the image has been removed. An error was made screening as borders are not acceptable and we agree with your expectation an effort is made to edit no matter how rare an image is.
Regards
Hi
You can reupload the corrected files via the accepted tab in your photo corner.
Regards
Hi
It means we have over 100 accepted shots of the registration.
Regards
Hello All We originally granted Tapatalk access to our forum in order to provide a better mobile experience for our members. Last month, TapaTalk notified us that they are changing ownership. After reviewing their service, other forums’ experiences, and member feedback, we have decided to wind down ...
Jump to postHi All
When converting to profile in PS if the 'Flatten Image to Preserve Appearance' is checked and the image saved it may cause the display as shared in the OP.
Regards
Paul
Hello All
As noted by Moose135 the search cluster was worked on and images indexed. You should be able to see all your images again now.
Please advise if you are still encountering any issues.
Regards
Paul
Hi All
The aviation motive is acceptable feel free to upload your best edit for screening.
Thanks and regards
Paul
Hi John
We've had a further look and the only returns are for images on this site plus another the photographer uploads to. Given the photographer's profession and their other images we've no reason to believe it is a satellite image.
Regards
Paul
Hi Unattendedbag
You've not identified any images. Please provide some ID numbers so we can do a search to see if they have been downloaded from elsewhere on the web as you state.
Thank you
Hi scbriml
It's not you as it is occurring on upload for those two files
Regards
Paul
Hello Toering
The vintage and creative queues are screened quicker than the regular queue as they are shorter in addition to images which qualify for priority screening. You are able to check what images qualify for priority in our acceptance guide.
Regards
Paul
Hi
It's in the database as a new registration. The screening log showed no one had depriorized it. It may have been a system error you saw.
Merry Christmas
Hi
Appears the image was added and builder field on its own is not usually a rejection.
Regards
Hi
No pictures from Associated Press or anywhere else, you have to take the pictures you upload.
Hi All
Images have started to index and for each of you who shared the ID numbers you should be able to view them now.
Regards
Paul
Hi All
Thanks for the ID numbers. Unfortunately this is taking longer than expected to resolve. If your images do not appear we shall offer priority uploads and apologies for the inconvenience.
Regards
Paul
Hi All
Some accepted images are not appearing in the DB. We are looking into the issue and hope to have it resolved shortly.
Please leave an ID number if you have been affected.
Regards
Paul
Hi Wiggy
You had some nice weather and hope to see some shots
Hi
It's still allowed thought the cost is closer to $1,240 an hour plus $80 landing fee. Chief pilot is still there and Brett is also very good.
Regards
Paul
Hi Hadleigh In the morning Shep's Mound would be best as the light is behind you and most of the traffic for 16L/34R will taxi past very close. Depending on which runways are in use in the afternoon and the type of shot you would like either the beach carpark or staff carpark are good vantage points...
Jump to postHello DuthSpotter1
Thanks for giving the crew time to have a look.
They believe one shot is fine and the other suffers more from contrast than an overexposed sky. A reupload will be asked for.
Regards
Paul
Hi All
We undertook some server maintenance and as you noted it is an indexing issue. Please allow a few hours for the indexing to complete and all your images will again display. You can still see them in the accepted tab in your photo corner.
Regards
Paul
Hello B77L
Thanks for your feedback and there's no excuse other than mistakes sometimes happen.
Regards
Paul
Hello
You will find the reupload link next to your images under accepted in the Photo Corner
https://www.airliners.net/user/photo-corner
Regards
Hello Nigel
This bug happens occasionally please upload the image again and mark it priority screening with a note
Regards
Paul
Hi DutchSpotter1
The motive appears different
Regards
Hi Dutchspotter1
They're screened individually though the team are able to decide how many they view i.e. 5, 10, 20 or more. How many are chosen is a batch.
Regards
Paul
Hi Dutchspotter1
No, we've not changed our policy. Nor would we and these were screened same batch so an error was made. We have asked the photographer to correct and reupload.
Regards
Paul
Hello N94504 It has always been defined as show days as long as we've had the acceptance guide. That said, new registrations and liveries arriving early for shows qualify for those reasons and there have been times when some arrivals from the major manufacturer's or military formations have been giv...
Jump to postHello Dutchspotter1
Thanks for your post and we agree with your point of view, accept we have made an error and the one with the lowest views will be removed.
Regards
Paul
Hello Wiggy
I've replied to your email
Regards
Paul
Hello Mark Thank you for your feedback. The degree of discretion depends on the newsworthy nature of the shot and amount of photographer's uploading it. There are too many variables to list and as for RIAT and Singapore we would be happy to add if community wants. The above text is now live in the a...
Jump to postHello Chris
Unfortunately it had to be removed fpr editing as it was two images overlayed into one
Hello Galderson
Sure please use screeners@airliners.net
Regards
Paul
Hello All This is the text for the update with the amendment suggested by Cary, It shall be the exact same text in the acceptance guide and priority upload URL https://www.airliners.net/photo-upload/upload The following subjects will be given priority screening and will qualify for a News Banner on ...
Jump to postHello Dutchspotter1
There is enough aviation motive without any aircraft for acceptance. You noted runways are acceptable and some of the more remote ones have very little aviation motive but they have good database value and are acceptable.
Regards
Paul