Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
What Was Wrong With These 747's?  
User currently offlineKearnet From United States, joined Sep 2001, 173 posts, RR: 0
Posted (6 years 1 month 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 1330 times:

*I want apoligize for the long post, I just feel like being detailed*

Thanks to the Discovery Wings Channel, I have been privaledge to be able to watch the BBC show "Airport". In the last two episodes I've seen, there were problems with 747-400's (ironically both destined for SYD). One was a QF and the other was either QF or BA. I'm curious if anyone knows what was exactly wrong with these two planes.

The 1st one (The one I don't remember which carrier it was) Defiantly had an interesting problem: Apperently a piece of the engine had broken in flight and they had to GLUE the piece back in! (I'm gonna take a sec to ask a detailed question(s) so please bear with me). Now with this I'm curious as to what piece was broken. And What exactly is behind the main blade on those engines (The repairs were being done by reaching between two of the main fan blades.) From the cameras perspective it looked like there was a honey-comb like filter behind it (I think I was seeing things). As apperently the adhesive was taking a long time to cure, they had to bring over a air heater, which I guess did the trick. All I know is that If I had been a pax on the flight, I might be tempted to request to get off! Only because I would be thinking of the UA flight 232 in Sioux City. Grant that I don't think a blade woud come off, but more, that the glued piece becoming unattached and blowing out the engine.

The 2nd one which is the QF flight had an electrical problem, that apperently was causing a "buzzing" sound. The only think of is the sound high energy power lines make. I know that a part needed to be replaced, and at one time the camera showed they were working at the tail section. I'm guessing APU problems? (That is were the APU is locate ona 747 right?).

I was just really curious about these flight and wanted to knwo if anyone knew what had happend to these planes.

5 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineXFSUgimpLB41X From United States, joined Aug 2000, 3253 posts, RR: 24
Reply 1, posted (6 years 1 month 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 1300 times:

Second one definitely sounds like an APU generator problem.


Chicks dig winglets.
User currently offlineAJ From Australia, joined Nov 1999, 2285 posts, RR: 24
Reply 2, posted (6 years 1 month 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 1286 times:

The first one was just a cold stream panel. It is not a rotating part and the engine operates without it!

User currently offlineFlybulldog From United States, joined Aug 2000, 338 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (6 years 1 month 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 1047 times:

In the first case, the mechanics seemed to take forever to find the problem. They showed them following an engineering schematic with confused looks on their faces. I didn't feel very confident that they knew what the problem was.

User currently offlineAJ From Australia, joined Nov 1999, 2285 posts, RR: 24
Reply 4, posted (6 years 1 month 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 910 times:

Planet Heathrow, it's life, but not as we know it!

User currently offlineA320-Tech From United States, joined Jan 2002, 38 posts, RR: 2
Reply 5, posted (6 years 1 month 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 877 times:

Kearnet,

I caught a few minutes of the show you spoke of. The panel that was glued back together was the fan shroud of the engine. This is a panel, as you had described, made of a composite / honeycomb material. the purpose of this panel is to remain a 'rub strip' for the tip of the fan blades and will wear down as the engine operates. It is permitted to have a certain amount of this missing and still operate the engine. I do not recall how much. A large percentage of the time required to return an aircraft back to service is obtaining the correct refrences in the maintenance/structural/engine manuals. Even if this part came off in flight it would not cause any damage to the engine as you are thinking, have no worries.  Smile/happy/getting dizzy

A320 Tech

Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This TopicWhat Was Wrong With These 747's?
Username: 


No username? Sign up now!
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!           DETAILED RULES (NEW)
  • Password: 


    Forgot Password? Be reminded.
    Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)

    Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help
    FORUM RULES HAVE CHANGED - READ THEM HERE

    Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


    Similar topics:More similar topics...
    What Was Wrong With The Plane I Just Flew? posted Sat Sep 30 2006 00:56:30 by OyKIE
    What Goes Wrong With The Generator? posted Mon May 6 2002 09:42:32 by Popee
    What Went Wrong With This Landing? posted Sun Sep 2 2001 00:50:41 by Climbout
    What Was With Braniff: 2nd A.G. Livery posted Mon Jul 28 2003 01:27:12 by BR715-A1-30
    What Was This Big Pencil With 777 On It At LBG? posted Wed Jul 2 2003 16:04:28 by UTA_flyinghigh
    What Are These 747 Cargo Types? posted Sat Feb 15 2003 00:23:26 by QANTAS747-438
    Whats Wrong With This Photo Lockheed C121C posted Fri Oct 13 2006 01:18:53 by Airfoilsguy
    Whats Wrong With This Photo posted Thu Oct 5 2006 20:10:47 by Airfoilsguy
    What Is Wrong On This Finnair A340? posted Tue Jul 18 2006 21:36:41 by Lufthansi
    Whats Wrong With This Plane? posted Fri Jun 30 2006 16:45:31 by Musapapaya

    Your ad here!
    Printer friendly format