Bruce From United States, joined May 1999, 4905 posts, RR: 17 Posted (1 month 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 1008 times:
I really think those cameras mounted on the solid rocket boosters are cool but I was thinking, would it even be possible to mount a camera in the vertical stabilizer, like the 777 and A340?
I know the leading edge of the vert. stab. has insulator tiles but how heat-critical is that zone? Since the orbiter's angle of attack is very steep nose-up, I would think that area doesn't get as hot as the wing leading edge where the hole was on Columbia.
Or, is there a material out there that is almost as heat resistant but clear that could cover a camera hole? How are the camera holes covered on the jetliner?
Another idea - how about the OMS pods - I dont think the tops of them have any black tiles which means they're non-critical areas.
It would be very cool because as far as i know, no human has ever observed a spacecraft's exterior during re-entry. All we have is artist renderings and computer simulations.
Bruce
Bruce Leibowitz - Green Bay, WI (GRB/KGRB) - Canon 20D/100-400L IS lens
HaveBlue From United States, joined Jan 2004, 1296 posts, RR: 1 Reply 1, posted (1 month 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 890 times:
Yeah I like that idea. The only time I've seen the 'aura' of reentry fire is from a handheld camera taken from inside the shuttle cockpit. You can just see the orangish glow outside the window. I'd love to see a good external shot of what's going on.
Vzlet From United States, joined Mar 2004, 736 posts, RR: 0 Reply 2, posted (1 month 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 865 times:
Columbia had just such a device, the Shuttle Infrared Leeside Temperature Sensing (SILTS) system. It was mounted at the top of the vertical stabilizer and provided infrared images during reentry.