Escorted 747 Spotted Over Vermont-Any Information? — Civil Aviation Forum | Airliners.net
624 users checked-in.You are not checked-in. No username? Join us!



Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Escorted 747 Spotted Over Vermont-Any Information?  
User currently offlineFrontiercpt From United States, joined Jun 2004, 957 posts, RR: 7
Posted (6 days 2 hours 48 minutes ago) and read 14272 times:

Hey everyone,

On Friday, I saw a four-engined (looked like a 747, but I may be wrong) aircraft flying over Woodstock, Vermont, escorted by four fighters. I didn't get much time to look at it closely, because it disappeared behind a cloud just after I spotted it.

Anyone have any information on this aircraft?

Thanks guys!
Sean


High school is like a roll of toilet paper. The closer you get to the end, the faster it seems to go.

23 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineZANL188 From United States, joined Oct 2006, 1088 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (6 days 2 hours 35 minutes ago) and read 14235 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

You sure it wasn't a KC-135?


Legal considerations provided by: Dewey, Cheatum, and Howe

User currently offlineFrontiercpt From United States, joined Jun 2004, 957 posts, RR: 7
Reply 2, posted (6 days 1 hour 56 minutes ago) and read 14040 times:



Quoting ZANL188 (Reply 1):

No clue, all I could tell was that it looked something like a 747  boggled 


High school is like a roll of toilet paper. The closer you get to the end, the faster it seems to go.

User currently offlineMastermis From Cayman Islands, joined Apr 2008, 5 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (6 days 1 hour 50 minutes ago) and read 14003 times:

Would Air Force 1 be escorted in that manner? Maybe the Veep was headed to an "undisclosed location"  Smile President would have been in Texas for Jenna's wedding!

User currently offlineEMBQA From United States, joined Oct 2003, 6867 posts, RR: 7
Reply 4, posted (6 days 1 hour 38 minutes ago) and read 13908 times:

A KC-135 doing a drag without a doubt. I lived up in that area and would see that all the time


"It's not the size of the dog in the fight, but the size of the fight in the dog"

User currently offlineSEPilot From United States, joined Dec 2006, 2738 posts, RR: 5
Reply 5, posted (6 days 1 hour 20 minutes ago) and read 13781 times:

I have seen C-5A's flying over Vermont; I have seen them refueling from KC-135's as well. So it could have been either a C-5A or a KC-135 and not been out of the ordinary (but as the fighters were with it it was probably a KC-135); AF-1 is not a possibility. The People's Republic of Vermont is one of the very few states that President Bush has never visited, and I would expect his visit to be announced by engraved snowballs from hell. I also doubt that AF-1 would be escorted in flight by fighters; they would be in the air but not that close to it. Formation flying is inherently dangerous, and there would be no need to have the fighters close, as they would be tasked to intercept any intruder long before it got near. The only time another plane would get anywhere near AF-1 would be if it had to refuel, and I suspect that would only happen in practice (without the president on board) or in actual full-scale war.


The problem with making things foolproof is that fools are so doggone ingenious...

User currently offlineNbgskygod From United States, joined May 2004, 309 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (6 days 40 minutes ago) and read 13567 times:

That was a KC-135, I got a pic of it as it went over Enfield, NH. There were 4 F15s, I got a shot of the one just after it joined up with the tanker. I would have gotten a better shot of it, but I couldn't get the lens asembled in time.

Big version: Width: 1024 Height: 768 File size: 320kb



"I use multi-billion dollar military satellite systems to find tupperware in the woods."

User currently offlineOPNLguy From United States, joined Jun 1999, 12020 posts, RR: 66
Reply 7, posted (5 days 23 hours 8 minutes ago) and read 13271 times:

There's a military IR route running roughly from NW of Rutland to NE of Montpelier; are any of the locales mentioned so far in this thread along that general axis, or viewable from it?


Carelessness and overconfidence are usually far more dangerous than deliberately accepted risks.

User currently offlineN766UA From United States, joined Jul 1999, 6681 posts, RR: 32
Reply 8, posted (5 days 23 hours 5 minutes ago) and read 13261 times:

They definately do alot of refueling up there. Surely a -135 and its compliment of fighters.


If God meant man to fly, He'd have given us bigger wallets.

User currently offlineNbgskygod From United States, joined May 2004, 309 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (5 days 22 hours 41 minutes ago) and read 13118 times:



Quoting N766UA (Reply 8):
They definately do alot of refueling up there. Surely a -135 and its compliment of fighters.

They do a lot of refueling up here, but usually its a C5 being dragged across the sky. I have seen a KC-10 being dragged by a KC-135 before though.


"I use multi-billion dollar military satellite systems to find tupperware in the woods."

User currently offlineChrisNH From United States, joined Jun 1999, 2604 posts, RR: 1
Reply 10, posted (5 days 22 hours 35 minutes ago) and read 13073 times:

Here's a map showing the areas where refueling is done:

Looks like Track AR-205 to me

Big version: Width: 700 Height: 500 File size: 137kb


User currently offlineNbgskygod From United States, joined May 2004, 309 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (5 days 21 hours 36 minutes ago) and read 12410 times:



Quoting ChrisNH (Reply 10):
Looks like Track AR-205 to me

its actually AR-631 that passes over this area.

Big version: Width: 1179 Height: 793 File size: 731kb



"I use multi-billion dollar military satellite systems to find tupperware in the woods."

User currently offlineFrontiercpt From United States, joined Jun 2004, 957 posts, RR: 7
Reply 12, posted (5 days 21 hours 11 minutes ago) and read 12012 times:

Wow, thanks for all the responses guys! That definitely answers my question, I'm glad someone knew  Silly


High school is like a roll of toilet paper. The closer you get to the end, the faster it seems to go.

User currently offlineAirplanenut From United States, joined Sep 2001, 554 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (5 days 19 hours 30 minutes ago) and read 10553 times:

Where are those planes based? I know there's a small fleet at Pease AFB in Portsmouth, NH... makes for a nice display if you do a low approach at the airport.


Why yes, in fact, I am a rocket scientist... at least one in the making...

User currently offlineNbgskygod From United States, joined May 2004, 309 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (5 days 15 hours 45 minutes ago) and read 7852 times:



Quoting Airplanenut (Reply 13):
Where are those planes based?

The F-15s are probibly MaANG birds from Barns, and the KC-135 is either from Pease or Bangor.


"I use multi-billion dollar military satellite systems to find tupperware in the woods."

User currently offlineStickers From South Africa, joined Sep 2007, 79 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (5 days 10 hours 21 minutes ago) and read 5844 times:



Quoting SEPilot (Reply 5):
The only time another plane would get anywhere near AF-1 would be if it had to refuel, and I suspect that would only happen in practice (without the president on board) or in actual full-scale war.

IIRC didn't AF1 get a refuel with the president on board during the 9/11 tradgedy. I seem to recall reports that the president was on board AF1 for a great deal of time after the second tower was hit.

User currently offlineSEPilot From United States, joined Dec 2006, 2738 posts, RR: 5
Reply 16, posted (5 days 6 hours 22 minutes ago) and read 3767 times:



Quoting Stickers (Reply 15):
IIRC didn't AF1 get a refuel with the president on board during the 9/11 tradgedy. I seem to recall reports that the president was on board AF1 for a great deal of time after the second tower was hit.

If that is the case then it would be a lesser level of war than I envisioned; but it would still be a national emergency.
As to the question of where planes are based, Burlington has a number of F-16's. No F-15's, though, AFAIK. Pease has a large number of KC-135's; I was lucky enough to get a ride on one when I was involved in CAP; also got the opportunity to fly the KC-135 simulator. FUN!!!!!!  bigthumbsup   bigthumbsup   bigthumbsup 


The problem with making things foolproof is that fools are so doggone ingenious...

User currently offlineChrisNH From United States, joined Jun 1999, 2604 posts, RR: 1
Reply 17, posted (5 days 5 hours 25 minutes ago) and read 2991 times:



Quoting Nbgskygod (Reply 14):
The F-15s are probibly MaANG birds from Barns, and the KC-135 is either from Pease or Bangor.

Would we assume that those F-15s pretty much HAVE to belong to Westfield (Barnes?). There are no other F-15s based anywhere else in New England. The only other possibility is F-15s from other bases in the country heading for European deployment and getting more fuel along the way.

The KC-135 is an 'R' (re-engined) model, by the looks of it. And Pease has those.

User currently offlineEMBQA From United States, joined Oct 2003, 6867 posts, RR: 7
Reply 18, posted (5 days 5 hours 12 minutes ago) and read 2809 times:

Quoting Stickers (Reply 15):
I seem to recall reports that the president was on board AF1 for a great deal of time after the second tower was hit.

How soon we forget...............No... by the time he left Florida the second tower had been hit. They did a hop over to Barksdale AFB, then up to Offutt in Nebraska under the escort of F-16's from the Texas ANG. Stayed there for a short stay, then back to DC. At no time was there a need to in-flight refuel. I do think when he did the trip to Iraq for Thanksgiving that one year the did in-flight refuel.

[Edited 2008-05-12 08:09:15]


"It's not the size of the dog in the fight, but the size of the fight in the dog"

User currently offlineBond007 From United States, joined Mar 2005, 3801 posts, RR: 3
Reply 19, posted (5 days 5 hours 9 minutes ago) and read 2755 times:



Quoting SEPilot (Reply 16):
Burlington has a number of F-16's

Yeah, Burlington has 15 F-16s AFAIK, and they fly at least some of them almost every weekday. They are currently replacing them with later models.

Burlington also gets a lot of stuff doing approaches and touch and goes. Often KC135s, C130s, and even a C-5 from Westover a couple of weeks back.

Jimbo


I'd rather be on the ground wishing I was in the air, than in the air wishing I was on the ground!

User currently offlineRFields5421 From United States, joined Jul 2007, 937 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (5 days 5 hours 6 minutes ago) and read 2743 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

On 9/11 the President didn't spend very much time in the air in AF1.

They quickly moved him, but at that time, the bird did not have the upgraded comm suites to allow him to keep in contact with the rapidly progressing, rapidly changing situation. They made two landings before returning to DC with much of the time on the ground trying to gather current information. The president's staff was also having a lengthy battle with the Secret Service - who wanted the president to be completely hidden and secure for a couple days. The President and his staff won the battle - arguing the country needed to see the President unafraid and in the open.

Quote:
On board Air Force One following the terrorist attacks on 11 September 2001, President Bush was unable to hold a videoconference in flight, adequately monitor news coverage, or receive necessary data from key people on the ground. The President couldn't even watch CNN. Once Bush arrived at Offutt Air Force Base in Nebraska, StratCom's more advanced equipment put the President in better communication. After September 11, money was immediately allocated to upgrade four Presidential planes at a total cost of less than $50 million.

http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/aircraft/vc-25.htm

I think, but am not sure, that AF1 was refueled in the air during the President's trip to Baghdad on Thanksgiving 2003.

User currently offlineStickers From South Africa, joined Sep 2007, 79 posts, RR: 0
Reply 21, posted (5 days 2 hours 4 minutes ago) and read 699 times:



Quoting EMBQA (Reply 18):
How soon we forget...............No... by the time he left Florida the second tower had been hit.



Quoting RFields5421 (Reply 20):
On 9/11 the President didn't spend very much time in the air in AF1.

I stand corrected. The memory must be getting a little old.  old  Also though, there were so many different reports that came our way, as well as different documentaries, that i must have just remembered one of those that were incorrect. Just as an aside question, ....is AF1 and its few sister ships in the Airforce the only 747 's that are kitted out for air to air refuel, or are there other 747's that have this modification?

Stickers.  Confused

User currently offlineEMBQA From United States, joined Oct 2003, 6867 posts, RR: 7
Reply 22, posted (5 days 1 hour 42 minutes ago) and read 650 times:

Quoting Stickers (Reply 21):
Just as an aside question, ....is AF1 and its few sister ships in the Airforce the only 747 's that are kitted out for air to air refuel, or are there other 747's that have this modification?

No... the E4-B can be inflight refueled as well. I think Iran's 747 can be re-fueled as well, but how and by whom I don't know. The best I can tell only the US (VC-25 and E4-B), Japan, Saudi and Iran fly the 747 in their Gov't fleet

[Edited 2008-05-12 11:39:27]


"It's not the size of the dog in the fight, but the size of the fight in the dog"