Bustin From Spain, joined May 2005, 45 posts, RR: 0 Reply 1, posted (2 months 2 weeks 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 5647 times:
I have this picture rejected with centered reason. I know I have a little tail high, but the nose is centered and some screeners prefer this way to center the frame. The problem is that if I surely low the tail to another screener will say me this looks low.
I would like some help to correct and re-uploaded the picture or if is worth appeal.
JakTrax From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 1477 posts, RR: 3 Reply 6, posted (2 months 2 weeks 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 5604 times:
AA173HVY,
Post-capture processing will normally help, however I'm afraid all these have serious quality issues which I doubt can be corrected.
Once again guys, feedback on these edits I did for a friend (were at the bottom of last pre-screen thread and will therefore now not be scrutinised) - different to my normnal workflow so I was worried about any softness.
Really nice and shiny aircraft, but borderline oversharpened. There are some jaggies in the windows and the star logo. And possibly a bit higher in the frame. I really like your shot, love the p-51
If you sit 10 hours spotting in rain you are plane crazy
JohnKrist From Sweden, joined Jan 2005, 504 posts, RR: 2 Reply 9, posted (2 months 2 weeks 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 5600 times:
Karl, I gave feedback on the Finnair in the other thread. The SAS is possibly ever so slightly soft on the front section of the fuselage, but those SAS titles are pain to photograph.
If you sit 10 hours spotting in rain you are plane crazy
Michlis From United States, joined Jul 2007, 441 posts, RR: 1 Reply 13, posted (2 months 2 weeks 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 5475 times:
Quoting JohnKrist (Reply 7): Really nice and shiny aircraft, but borderline oversharpened. There are some jaggies in the windows and the star logo. And possibly a bit higher in the frame. I really like your shot, love the p-51
Thanks for the input everyone! The shot was accepted!
"The untrodden path is choked by the weeds of tradition; be not afraid to cut through." Attributed to Hyman Rickover
Daleaholic From United Kingdom (England), joined Oct 2005, 2611 posts, RR: 12 Reply 14, posted (2 months 2 weeks 5 days ago) and read 5456 times:
I have just uploaded this but I think it is too big... can anybody give me some advice on 'big' picture sizes. This one is 1600x1200... what size should I be aiming for?
Religion is an illusion of childhood... Outgrown under proper education.
JakTrax From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 1477 posts, RR: 3 Reply 18, posted (2 months 2 weeks 5 days ago) and read 5440 times:
Quoting Mke717spotter (Reply 17): Can someone please give me some feedback on the shots I've posted above? Thanks
US Airways
No chance - there is a ground vehicle obstructing the nose-gear and it seems to be the wrong size.
Northwest
Nice shot but bad crop (not centered properly), wrong upload size and appears to need slight CCW rotation.
Wing shot
Just doesn't do it for me I'm afraid. Boring; not much to look at and there's a curious streak top-right, about 3cm from the edge of the frame. Also wrong size.
Midwest
Possible but I'd crop closer in on the nose right-hand side. Also looks slightly soft on my monitor.
ANITIX87 From Switzerland, joined Mar 2005, 2366 posts, RR: 11 Reply 21, posted (2 months 2 weeks 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 5412 times:
Quoting Othic (Reply 19): how about the photos below?
Sorry, Othic. These both have quality issues that I don't think can be helped. These are for the personal collection, I'm afraid.
Quoting ZakHH (Reply 10): Please let me have your comments on this one:
Zak, we need to see the full-size version. It is possible that when you make it bigger, some quality issues and other flaws will emerge. Post a larger version and you'll get better feedback.